You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we are using native erigon as the miner in the devnet. However this means that we then need to stop the devnet - copy the state data and launch jerigon to get access to the zeroTracer to build transaction traces. I think it would be cleaner if we were to dockerise jerigon and use jerigon as the miner in this devnet. This would allow us to get seamless access to the zeroTracer without the need to stop the devnet and make the UX more seamless.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we are using native erigon as the miner in the devnet. However this means that we then need to stop the devnet - copy the state data and launch jerigon to get access to the zeroTracer to build transaction traces. I think it would be cleaner if we were to dockerise jerigon and use jerigon as the miner in this devnet. This would allow us to get seamless access to the zeroTracer without the need to stop the devnet and make the UX more seamless.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: