You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
let's wait for future feature requests to decide on one of the following
adding an explicit attribute for searchValue on options - which is what the user can look for when querying
use one of those two "hacks" as a solution
a) make the field "remote" and filter on the user app by more than just the option.label (aka by option.label || option.value
b) make the label (since this is what the internal implementation uses know when the user queries) have the same value as the value and use the slot to show the label you want the user to see (e.g. { label: 'Label', value: 'Value' } --> becomes { label: 'Value', value: 'Value' } and the slot for option ACTUALLY shows 'Label'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
carsoli
changed the title
let's wait for future feature requests to decide on one of the following
Support different query behavior on KtField*Select
May 30, 2022
let's wait for future feature requests to decide on one of the following
a) make the field "remote" and filter on the user app by more than just the
option.label
(aka byoption.label || option.value
b) make the
label
(since this is what the internal implementation uses know when the user queries) have the same value as thevalue
and use the slot to show the label you want the user to see (e.g. { label: 'Label', value: 'Value' } --> becomes { label: 'Value', value: 'Value' } and the slot for option ACTUALLY shows 'Label'Originally posted by @carsoli in #565 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: