You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One thing to still improve (and is a low hanging fruit) would be to fix the issues found when running a style check on the library. I just did those using Dymola 2023x Refresh1 on v1.0.0: DroneLibrary_StyleCheckLog.html.zip
Now that report is very strict but what should at least be fixed (also when thinking of the library reward) is:
Must
"Class description string missing"
"Component description string beginning with lower case character for"
"Class description string starting with whitespace"
Optional
"Documentation missing" (this is quite a big job)
"(Possibly) insufficient documentation" (points to an empty html part, so same as above)
"Mixing of components and equations" (should be investigated)
Ignore
"Bad class name Name of model shall start with capital letter. Name shall not contain '_'." (not ideal but we can probably live with those for now
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One thing to still improve (and is a low hanging fruit) would be to fix the issues found when running a style check on the library. I just did those using Dymola 2023x Refresh1 on v1.0.0:
DroneLibrary_StyleCheckLog.html.zip
Now that report is very strict but what should at least be fixed (also when thinking of the library reward) is:
Must
Optional
Ignore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: