You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description:
Randomness generation plays a critical role during the Phase 1 Powers of Tau setup ceremony, but I believe there are opportunities to further enhance its security and transparency. A more robust approach to randomness generation and verification would help reinforce trust among participants.
Proposed Improvements:
Hybrid Randomness Generation: I suggest combining system-generated randomness (like /dev/random) with user-supplied entropy for the randomness contribution process. This approach would ensure a stronger and more secure randomness pool, mitigating the risk of weak entropy sources.
Verification of Contributions: Introducing a verification mechanism where participants can independently verify that their contributions were included correctly in the final result would add an extra layer of transparency. A Merkle tree-based proof system could be used to allow participants to check their contributions after the setup phase.
Implementing these improvements would not only increase participant confidence but also bolster the security of the randomness generation process
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
Randomness generation plays a critical role during the Phase 1 Powers of Tau setup ceremony, but I believe there are opportunities to further enhance its security and transparency. A more robust approach to randomness generation and verification would help reinforce trust among participants.
Proposed Improvements:
Hybrid Randomness Generation: I suggest combining system-generated randomness (like /dev/random) with user-supplied entropy for the randomness contribution process. This approach would ensure a stronger and more secure randomness pool, mitigating the risk of weak entropy sources.
Verification of Contributions: Introducing a verification mechanism where participants can independently verify that their contributions were included correctly in the final result would add an extra layer of transparency. A Merkle tree-based proof system could be used to allow participants to check their contributions after the setup phase.
Implementing these improvements would not only increase participant confidence but also bolster the security of the randomness generation process
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: