You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As in the title, but would it be reasonable to make Link and AtomicLink#[repr(C)]? I realise that an external library could put the links into a bad state, but this would mean that a list, for example, could be constructed in Rust and then passed to a consumer in C. My use case is actually to pass between two Rust binaries in the same address space.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As in the title, but would it be reasonable to make
Link
andAtomicLink
#[repr(C)]
? I realise that an external library could put the links into a bad state, but this would mean that a list, for example, could be constructed in Rust and then passed to a consumer in C. My use case is actually to pass between two Rust binaries in the same address space.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: