-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HIGHRES IMU MAVLink Message #28082
Comments
Thank you for creating this issue. We are working with Ardupilot-based systems for remote sensing applications. Scaled/rounded IMU data does not work there as it is not precise enough... The HIGHRES_IMU funcionality would help us a lot. |
I second this! |
If I understand correctly the development branch already supports everything you need? We branch master for each new major release, 4.6 is not too far away. |
I misunderstood the process. Thought every release is from master 🥇 |
Feature request
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Multiple researchers and makers get frustrated with only getting rounded IMU data for applications like SLAM or trajectory reconstruction. Currently logfiles have to be downloaded from an SD Card and fed into scripts, retrieving the unrounded data.
Describe the solution you'd like
The MAVLink
HIGHRES_IMU
functionallity included in a stable release of ArduPilot.Meaning the integration of Commits b159ecc and 40314a5.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The alternatives are: Using
SCALED_IMU3
, orRAW_IMU
MAVLink messages or retrieving the data from logs on a SD Card (offline).Those are suboptimal, because the values are either rounded, uncalibrated or come with a lot of effort, respectively.
Platform
[ x ] All
[ ] AntennaTracker
[ ] Copter
[ ] Plane
[ ] Rover
[ ] Submarine
Additional context
Legacy PR #24258
Recent PR #27007
Fix PR #28058
This issue is meant for discussion and coordination of this effort.
I am open for implementing additional functionality when given clear directions on how to (I am new to ArduPilot development and the MAVLink Protocol)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: