You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently all hidden facts are prominently labelled as "hidden". Some hidden facts are linked to HTML elements with -ix-sec-hidden or -ix-esef-hidden style properties, and the viewer shows this association, but still labels the facts as "hidden".
This is causing some confusion, as some are interpreting this as implying poor tagging, even though it's the recommended approach in some situations (e.g. extensible enumerations).
We should remove the "hidden" label for such facts, and replace it with a more subtle indication that they're using the "style hack" mechanism. We could perhaps add something to all facts showing the transform being used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What should we change and why?
Currently all hidden facts are prominently labelled as "hidden". Some hidden facts are linked to HTML elements with
-ix-sec-hidden
or-ix-esef-hidden
style properties, and the viewer shows this association, but still labels the facts as "hidden".This is causing some confusion, as some are interpreting this as implying poor tagging, even though it's the recommended approach in some situations (e.g. extensible enumerations).
We should remove the "hidden" label for such facts, and replace it with a more subtle indication that they're using the "style hack" mechanism. We could perhaps add something to all facts showing the transform being used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: