Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export of demolished #154

Open
owensharp opened this issue Jan 16, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

Export of demolished #154

owensharp opened this issue Jan 16, 2020 · 9 comments
Labels
parameters-properties Error in resulting Revit parameter or IFC properties/property sets Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency

Comments

@owensharp
Copy link

hi,

Continuing issue from old sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcexporter/discussion/general/thread/8d20c2e296/

Issue is we need to export existing, new and demolished elements to a single IFC file - just as can be done with NWC. I have Phase Filter set to Show All, and exporter set to export visible elements, but the visible demolished elements are not exported

@BIMLUND
Copy link

BIMLUND commented Apr 8, 2021

Please fix this so we can export objects that are marked as Demolished. We need this for QTO in IFC-application

@BIMLUND
Copy link

BIMLUND commented Jun 17, 2021

Any intrest in this? A work around might be export to DWG, import to Autocad Architecture and then export IFC.

@tcosse
Copy link

tcosse commented Dec 20, 2021

Yes, this would be very useful.

@TZwielehner
Copy link

TZwielehner commented Jul 29, 2022

Please fix ASAP! We need this every day!
@owensharp can you put a label on this to raise the priority?

@AngelVelezSosa
Copy link
Contributor

I am curious - why does this need to be a single IFC file? Could you create one IFC file per phase?

@TZwielehner
Copy link

TZwielehner commented Jul 29, 2022

Demolition is not a phase. It's a status. Revit or IFC don't know a "demolition phase". There is only a diff between later phase and earlier phase.
If I want to know the quantities of demolished elements I need this as an information.

@BIMLUND
Copy link

BIMLUND commented Aug 16, 2022

@TZwielehner: A easy workaround that works from Revit 2022: Create a view with Phase 0 (before demo). Then create a filter that only shows elements with Parameter "Phase Demolish". Since Revit 2022 you can now use "Phase Created" and "Phase Demolished" in filters. And it works to export demolished elements if the Phasing in the view is set to a phase when the element is not demolished yet. We use this to export IFC of all the demolition to do Quantification from IFC and Visualization in other tools.

@TZwielehner
Copy link

This partly works, however, if we insert a window in an existing wall the "demolished" opening does not receive this phase parameters. For intersecting walls an opening is created, that's a minor issue. What is not exported however are basic properties like the status (Pset_WallCommon.Status) which would allow more granular filtering.

@loek17
Copy link

loek17 commented Sep 13, 2022

This would be a good addition, having the possiblity to filter by a status (as discused in #250) or by the parameters "Phase Demolish" and "Phase Created" within a IFC is also preferred by me. This was the way we did it in NWC we would like to keep doing this when we switch to IFC.

It would also solve confusing when exporting by view (with Phase Filter set to None). Currenlty the ifc exporter will not export objects that are visible in the view but are "demolished".

i believe #428 would fix this issue if merged in the next release

@JOuellette-Autodesk JOuellette-Autodesk added parameters-properties Error in resulting Revit parameter or IFC properties/property sets Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency labels Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
parameters-properties Error in resulting Revit parameter or IFC properties/property sets Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants