Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] The actual LRO in Certificates.json is not marked as LRO #31421

Open
melina5656 opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] The actual LRO in Certificates.json is not marked as LRO #31421

melina5656 opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.

Comments

@melina5656
Copy link
Member

API Spec link

API Spec version

2023-12-01

Describe the bug

Failed to create or update a certificate.
There are many actual LROs that are not marked as LROs.
It seems that the following code is missing.

        "x-ms-long-running-operation": true,
        "x-ms-long-running-operation-options": {
          "final-state-via": "location"
        }

Expected behavior

No errors occurred

Actual behavior

Response Code: 202
JSON is empty

Reproduction Steps

Create a certificate and assign values to canonicalName and serverFarmId.

Environment

No response

@melina5656 melina5656 added the bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. label Nov 5, 2024
@v-jiaodi v-jiaodi added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Nov 5, 2024
@v-jiaodi
Copy link
Member

v-jiaodi commented Nov 5, 2024

@naveedaz Please help take a look, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug This issue requires a change to an existing behavior in the product in order to be resolved. Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants