Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[CI] Generated code shouldn't be included in the coverage report #2989

Open
14 tasks
keegan-caruso opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
14 tasks

[CI] Generated code shouldn't be included in the coverage report #2989

keegan-caruso opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Internal Indicates issue was opened by the IdentityModel team

Comments

@keegan-caruso
Copy link
Contributor

Which version of Microsoft.IdentityModel are you using?

NA

Where is the issue?

  • M.IM.JsonWebTokens
  • M.IM.KeyVaultExtensions
  • M.IM.Logging
  • M.IM.ManagedKeyVaultSecurityKey
  • M.IM.Protocols
  • M.IM.Protocols.OpenIdConnect
  • M.IM.Protocols.SignedHttpRequest
  • M.IM.Protocols.WsFederation
  • M.IM.TestExtensions
  • M.IM.Tokens
  • M.IM.Tokens.Saml
  • M.IM.Validators
  • M.IM.Xml
  • S.IM.Tokens.Jwt
  • Other (please describe)

CI

Is this a new or an existing app?

NA

Repro

Generated code shouldn't be in the coverage report.

image
@keegan-caruso keegan-caruso added the Internal Indicates issue was opened by the IdentityModel team label Nov 8, 2024
@pmaytak
Copy link
Contributor

pmaytak commented Nov 8, 2024

Should also be done along with #2983

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Internal Indicates issue was opened by the IdentityModel team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pmaytak @keegan-caruso