Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mixture Model Ideas #57

Open
karllark opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Mixture Model Ideas #57

karllark opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@karllark
Copy link
Member

karllark commented Nov 9, 2020

Inspired by @kmcquinn's ISM*-at-ST talk, the mixture model should have 3 terms. Stars internal to the galaxy being studied, the background galaxies/QSOs, and foreground stars.

The foreground stars can be modeled probabistically from a model of the Milky Way for the specific direction of the galaxy under study. This is exactly what is needed for the ensemble model.

The background galaxies could be determined from deep field observations (should include all usual filters).

By splitting the non-galaxy-being-studied model between foreground and background, it maybe more easy to generate and a higher fidelity model of the actual distribution of star fluxes.

@lea-hagen
Copy link
Member

To make sure I'm understanding correctly: instead of observing an offset field (to get both foreground and background sources), we'd use a MW model for foreground sources and a deep field (with no specific pointing requirement) for background sources?

@karllark
Copy link
Member Author

karllark commented Nov 9, 2020

That's an idea. Using a model for the foreground means that we maybe won't need a nearby offset field. The deep field info shouldn't depend on direction (modulo large scale structure of course).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants