Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Variable Model Uncertainties/Weights #58

Open
karllark opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Variable Model Uncertainties/Weights #58

karllark opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
fitting

Comments

@karllark
Copy link
Member

karllark commented Nov 9, 2020

Inspired by @kmcquinn's ISM*-at-ST talk, the different parts of the CMD (HR diagram) are known to be better/worse understood (e.g., Hidalgo et al. 2011). This could be easily reflected in the megabeast fits by adding a model uncertainty term to the fitting. Or maybe this is a straight weight in the Bayesian formulation. Maybe @eteq can provide some advice here.
@karllark
Copy link
Member Author

karllark commented Nov 9, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Other sources of info on this topic.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fitting
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@karllark