We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In bfo-core.ttl, we find dc11:license along with dc:license.
bfo-core.ttl
dc11:license
dc:license
dc11:license doesn't actually exist, so it would make sense to take it out.
(From the nit-picking department!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I the file dc11 is a prefix given in the header. It expands to http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#license does exist. I'm not sure how prefixes get defined. In the temporalized version dc is defined rather than dc11. However it makes no difference. What matters is the IRI after expansion.
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/" xml:base="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/" xmlns:dc11="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
Sorry, something went wrong.
If you are satisfied with this answer, that this is not a bug, please close the issue.
johnbeve
No branches or pull requests
In
bfo-core.ttl
, we finddc11:license
along withdc:license
.dc11:license
doesn't actually exist, so it would make sense to take it out.(From the nit-picking department!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: