Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provide defintions of continuant fiat boundary subClasses and history #210

Open
zhengj2007 opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@zhengj2007
Copy link
Contributor

zhengj2007 commented Jan 16, 2017

All subclasses of 'continuant fiat boundary' have elucidations that specify that they are defined in relation to a material entity. This can be specified of 'continuant fiat boundary' for the sake of parsimony.

In addition, 'Continuant fiat boundary' has a definition, but its subclasses have elucidations. This is odd since elucidations are supposed to exist for classes that are somehow too basic for definitions, but classes are defined in terms of their parent classes, and so should not be more basic than those parent classes. Therefore, the definitions should be specified for subClasses of 'continuant fiat boundary'.

Same comment applies to 'history'. Need to provide the definition for 'history'.

@zhengj2007 zhengj2007 changed the title Improve elucidations of continuant fiat boundary and its subClasses provide defintions of continuant fiat boundary subClasses and history Jan 16, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@zhengj2007 and others