Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Async API #4

Open
BarionLP opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #5
Open

Async API #4

BarionLP opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #5
Assignees
@BarionLP
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@BarionLP
Copy link
Owner

BarionLP commented Jan 9, 2025

not sure to what extend this goes, but i need to do async ops on options
@BarionLP BarionLP added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 9, 2025
@BarionLP BarionLP self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@BarionLP BarionLP changed the title Async api Async API Jan 9, 2025
@BarionLP
Copy link
Owner Author

BarionLP commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Main Question is: should the async methods catch errors inside the task?

probably yes? no! The developer expects exceptions! exception should never catched implicitly!
a better option would be to have an extra method like AsyncSave

@BarionLP BarionLP linked a pull request Jan 9, 2025 that will close this issue
Async API #5
Open
3 tasks
@BarionLP
Copy link
Owner Author

moving conversation over to #5

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@BarionLP BarionLP

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Async API BarionLP/Ametrin.Optional
1 participant
@BarionLP