You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The TM2 modeling system currently assigns short trips via an all-or-nothing assignment at the MAZ scale. The hypothesis is that very short trips have more of an impact on local roads than regional roads, so assigning at the MAZ scale would be better than the TAZ scale, where a large portion of the trip may be assigned to TAZ centroids.
The modeling system has not yet been used enough to know if this is a good or bad idea. But the distance threshold is potentially problematic. There are short trips, say less than 1 mile, that may not take the shortest path due to congestion. To avoid this, would it be better just to assign intrazonal TAZ trips (that are not intrazonal MAZ trips) at the MAZ scale? This would more directly leverage the multi-resolution network without the need for an arbitrary distance threshold.
Progress:
Sufficiently defined
Approach determined
Tests developed
User story satisfied
Doc strings
General documentation
Passing tests
Priority
Low
Level of Effort
Low
Resolution Ideas
As part of the resolution of #117, the change could be made to the logic that separates the MAZ-scale assignment trips and the TAZ-scale assignment trips.
User Story
The TM2 modeling system currently assigns short trips via an all-or-nothing assignment at the MAZ scale. The hypothesis is that very short trips have more of an impact on local roads than regional roads, so assigning at the MAZ scale would be better than the TAZ scale, where a large portion of the trip may be assigned to TAZ centroids.
The modeling system has not yet been used enough to know if this is a good or bad idea. But the distance threshold is potentially problematic. There are short trips, say less than 1 mile, that may not take the shortest path due to congestion. To avoid this, would it be better just to assign intrazonal TAZ trips (that are not intrazonal MAZ trips) at the MAZ scale? This would more directly leverage the multi-resolution network without the need for an arbitrary distance threshold.
Progress:
Priority
Low
Level of Effort
Low
Resolution Ideas
As part of the resolution of #117, the change could be made to the logic that separates the MAZ-scale assignment trips and the TAZ-scale assignment trips.
Project
Not right now
Who should be involved?
Users: @lmz, @FlaviaTsang, @gregerhardt
Reviewers: @i-am-sijia, @AshishKuls
Risk
Very low
Tests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: