Run cell2location on NanoString Data #91
-
I recently tried the advanced workflow on NanoString data. But it looks strange as Is there any latest functions for model training to use but haven't yet uploaded to the tutorial? Best wishes, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Vitalii |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @Mengyuan-Li1996 , could you share the names of the input files you have? Or send (a possibly downsampled version) to me? The data I worked with is from one of the first Nanostring-WTA runs and I think they changed the output files a few times since then. I will then see what I can do to make the input formats more clear and if possible make a script as you suggest. Generally three things are needed 1.) A matrix of unnormalized target probe counts, where 'target' means one gene or sometimes multiple genes with similar sequence (size: # ROIs x # Targets). This data should be in the 'TargetCountMatrix' in their output 2.) A matrix of unnormalized negative probe counts (size: # ROIs x # Negative Probes), those negative probes can usually be found in the 'ProbeCountMatrix' under a name such as 'NegProbe-WTA' (but they might have changed that since then). Optionally: 3.) Nuclei counts as a prior for cell numbers. Best wishes, Alexander |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Mengyuan, this data doesn't quite look like the usual output from the Nanostring pipelines. Also it looks like they don't provide the Negative Probe Counts. So the best way would be to get the 'TargetCountMatrix' from the file called Export3_BiologicalProbeQC and supply that to the standard cell2locatin pipeline. Results should still be acceptable like that. Otherwise, you can also contact the owners of the dataset and ask for the 'ProbeCountsMatrix', which should contain negative probe counts under names, such as 'NegProbe-WTA'. Best wishes, Alexander |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi Mengyuan,
this data doesn't quite look like the usual output from the Nanostring pipelines. Also it looks like they don't provide the Negative Probe Counts. So the best way would be to get the 'TargetCountMatrix' from the file called Export3_BiologicalProbeQC and supply that to the standard cell2locatin pipeline. Results should still be acceptable like that. Otherwise, you can also contact the owners of the dataset and ask for the 'ProbeCountsMatrix', which should contain negative probe counts under names, such as 'NegProbe-WTA'.
Best wishes,
Alexander