You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm repeating these requirements here just in case you missed them:
TODOs for Presenters:
•Duration: 10 minutes
•Content
–Brief introduction of the project
–The most appealing features in the system
–Major challenges and the solutions
–Lessons learnt/secret for success/summary
•Performance evaluation for each other (peer review between group members)
–Use 2-10 points for grading, where 2 means very bad and 10 means very good. If you believe that a group member did an excellent or extraordinary job in the whole semester, you can give 11 points (with 1 point as the bonus).
TODO for Audience
•Performance evaluation for other groups (peer review among groups)
–Use 2-10 points to grade the project quality for other groups, where 2 means very bad and 10 means very good. If you believe that a group did an excellent or extraordinary job, you can give 11 points (with 1 point as the bonus).
Because we have three sessions allocated for project presentation, please come to the classroom to attend as many sessions as possible in order to turn in your grading in-person to either TAs or me at the end of each session. For the peer review between group members, each member turns in your peer evaluation in the session when your group gives the presentation (at the end of the class). For the peer review among groups, each group turns in only one evaluation form at the end of the class, evaluating the groups who present that day. I'll talk more about this in-class later.
Cheers,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm repeating these requirements here just in case you missed them:
TODOs for Presenters:
•Duration: 10 minutes
•Content
–Brief introduction of the project
–The most appealing features in the system
–Major challenges and the solutions
–Lessons learnt/secret for success/summary
•Performance evaluation for each other (peer review between group members)
–Use 2-10 points for grading, where 2 means very bad and 10 means very good. If you believe that a group member did an excellent or extraordinary job in the whole semester, you can give 11 points (with 1 point as the bonus).
TODO for Audience
•Performance evaluation for other groups (peer review among groups)
–Use 2-10 points to grade the project quality for other groups, where 2 means very bad and 10 means very good. If you believe that a group did an excellent or extraordinary job, you can give 11 points (with 1 point as the bonus).
Because we have three sessions allocated for project presentation, please come to the classroom to attend as many sessions as possible in order to turn in your grading in-person to either TAs or me at the end of each session. For the peer review between group members, each member turns in your peer evaluation in the session when your group gives the presentation (at the end of the class). For the peer review among groups, each group turns in only one evaluation form at the end of the class, evaluating the groups who present that day. I'll talk more about this in-class later.
Cheers,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: