From b1707296e673f48dded6b08c11b329cfb081f7f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Michael=20J=C3=A4hn?= Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:04:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify Clarissa's report --- events/icon_meetings/2024-2.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/events/icon_meetings/2024-2.md b/events/icon_meetings/2024-2.md index 2e8397ce..d8fbb038 100644 --- a/events/icon_meetings/2024-2.md +++ b/events/icon_meetings/2024-2.md @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BG reported that she is using ICON below 1km. There has been a paper accepted us As a side project with Nadja Omanovic, they explored the representation of clouds at 1km and 65m resolutions, using both 1-moment and 2-moment schemes. They concluded that to represent clouds resolution is more important than on the microphysics scheme. ### Clarissa Kroll -CK reported that they are getting the ICON XTP ( **TODO ML**: ML can you correct? XTP is somehow what I understood but I guess I misunderstood something) setup and plan to merge it with ICON-EXCLAIM. Additionally, they are working on a radiative dumping option. +CK reported that they are using the icon-seamless/icon-xpp setup and plan to merge it with ICON-EXCLAIM. Additionally, they are working on a radiative dumping option. ### Doris Folini DF is just here to inform herself on ICON. She was part of Christoph Schär's group, which no longer exists.