Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

32/9 screen ratio support for scripted scopes #1413

Open
FingolfinA3 opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

32/9 screen ratio support for scripted scopes #1413

FingolfinA3 opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@FingolfinA3
Copy link

FingolfinA3 commented Feb 1, 2021

Is your enhancement related to a problem?
I have been using the CBA scripted scopes for my Tier One Weapons add-on and one user informed me, that they do not work properly with a 32/9 screen ratio while vanilla 2D scopes do. I contacted da12thMonkey and he referred me here.

The problem is that the PIP field is cut off on the sides, same for the 2D field. Changing/expanding the CBA scope models does not affect the overall size of the displayed scope and only distorts the visuals.

I know right now it only affects a small percentage of players, but numbers may very well rise in the future.

Solution you'd like:
So, I am hoping you can add 32/9 support for your scopes in one of the next releases.

Alternatives you've considered:

Additional context:
With CBA scopes:
https://i.imgur.com/V0Azrnf.png

After model changes made it worse:
https://i.imgur.com/LapRsw3.png

@commy2
Copy link
Contributor

commy2 commented Feb 1, 2021

I am not going to buy a 1000€ monitor to debug this anytime soon, but thanks for the report anyway.

How are your failed model changes relevant though?

@FingolfinA3
Copy link
Author

Just to let you know that there is nothing I can do about it. If it wouldn't require changes within the CBA files/setup, I wouldn't have bothered you.

Thanks anyway!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants