Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Canto Core Devs Meeting 10 Agenda #12

Open
bebekim opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Canto Core Devs Meeting 10 Agenda #12

bebekim opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@bebekim
Copy link

bebekim commented Sep 20, 2023

Updating roadmap as migration into Polygon CDK has been approved.

Decisions

Need to make decision on 2 things:

  1. Whether to upgrade cosmos-sdk version:
  • v0.47 (upgrade)

  • bring Cronos’ fork of ethermint back home a.k.a vanilla Ethermint

    • absent of stateful precompile contract
    • no custom patch on cometbft-db, cosmos-sdk
  • Pro

    • MEV (additional revenue)
    • Optimistic block processing (sub 1s)
  • Con

    • will not last long, less than a 0.5 year
  • v0.45 (no upgrade, current-version)

    • Pro
      • Bring decentralised Polygon CDK into light faster
      • Work to bring existing Canto functionality into Polygon CDK earlier
    • Con
      • No additional features
  1. Whether to put measures to mitigate security risk
  • Limit outflow of capital through IBC/bridge for the benefit of RWA

Update

FYI our progress with Polygon CDK:
Polygon CDK provides L2 tech stack, allowing zk proof of L1 and trustless bridge to L1

  • Shortcomings
    • sequencer is centralised
    • no verification of L2 consensus by L1
  • B-Harvest’s improvement
    • decentralised block creation via cometBFT
    • L2 consensus verified by L1 zkEVM proof
    • enhanced performance and scalability

Our progress has been received favourably by Polygon CTO so far and we are confident moving forward in this direction.

Requesting update

  • Any update progress of security audit on liquid staking module ?
  • When's onboarding module going Mainnet?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant