Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lack of clear goal will lead to long term failure #306

Closed
bugabinga opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 19 comments
Closed

Lack of clear goal will lead to long term failure #306

bugabinga opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 19 comments

Comments

@bugabinga
Copy link

In my opinion this project needs a set of clearly stated goals, otherwise there is no way to measure success.

These goals should naturally emerge democratically.

bugabinga added a commit to bugabinga/Chaos that referenced this issue May 27, 2017
@bengjerstad
Copy link

Sorry if this is the wrong place to put this but here are some other ideas that might make good goals. I don't want to get in the way of #307 so maybe after it is approved, this change can be voted on.

What about an upload feature on the main index page for static content upload?
Or an IPython notebook server from another port?
Or what about a node.js bot on the same box built by chaos bot.

@collinalexbell
Copy link

collinalexbell commented May 28, 2017

Go Big or Go Home.

I would like to see ChaosBot be directed towards becoming the foremost AI proponent of a universal basic income for its contributors. We get ChaosBot good at running a nonprofit that sells something like robotically grown food and then use the profits to fund opensource projects.

@phil-r
Copy link
Member

phil-r commented May 28, 2017

@SlightlyCyborg I really like your idea, but we're so far from what you're describing.
Right now we're mostly trying to make Chaosbot stable, changing webpage, tinkering with voting process and fighting off attempts to cease power.

@bugabinga
Copy link
Author

@bengjerstazd you should definitely put your ideas into a separate issue.

The issue at hand however, is not necessarily tightly coupled to #307. Here it needs to be established if goals of any kind are desired. The PR is only one possible set of proposed goals.

@hongaar
Copy link
Member

hongaar commented May 29, 2017

Agreed. We need a visionary leader! Maybe autocracy wasn't so bad after all.

no. of commits graph shows a slight decline 😮

image

@phil-r
Copy link
Member

phil-r commented May 29, 2017

"slight"

@collinalexbell
Copy link

collinalexbell commented May 29, 2017 via email

@collinalexbell
Copy link

collinalexbell commented May 29, 2017 via email

@phil-r
Copy link
Member

phil-r commented May 29, 2017

@SlightlyCyborg I'm sorry if this will sound rude, but your PR just edited Readme file and added the goals for the project you've never contributed to.

"When something is important enough, you do it even if
the odds aren't in your favor"

Start with yourself and start implementing UBI bot and Democratic AI. Odds aren't in your favor, but just talking about those things won't help, start implementing something and maybe others will follow.

If not you than who?

@collinalexbell
Copy link

@phil-r I always start with README.md. A clear README with a clear vision helps align the project. I want people to see that vision in the README.

I submitted another pull request #363

@phil-r
Copy link
Member

phil-r commented May 29, 2017

@SlightlyCyborg like this one ?

@collinalexbell
Copy link

collinalexbell commented May 29, 2017

EDIT: Ya.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 29, 2017

how about we make it into an intelligent chat bot that spiders the web and tries to advertise you stuff that could be interesting to you? that way chaosbot will become our sole source of news and media and skynet gets a headstart.

@Ajedi32
Copy link

Ajedi32 commented Jun 1, 2017

Personally I think I'd prefer #398 as Chaosbot's long-term goal.

@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 4, 2017

/vote close

This issue hasn't been active for a while. To keep it open, react with 👎

@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 4, 2017

/vote close This issue hasn't been active for a while. To keep it open, react with 👎

Command Ran

@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 4, 2017

⛔ The issue has been closed after a vote.

@chaosbot chaosbot closed this as completed Jun 4, 2017
@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 5, 2017

/vote close This issue hasn't been active for a while. To keep it open, react with 👎

Command Ran

@chaosbot
Copy link
Collaborator

chaosbot commented Jun 5, 2017

⛔ The issue has been closed after a vote.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants