Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
@brunosan, great talking today. I'm looping in @alexshepard on the iNat team and @macaodha who's been our key collaborator on the geomodel (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02564) It was great to hear about your vision for location embedding with Sentinel satellite images and all the applications that will have. I agree it would be very interesting to explore how your work could substitute in for the elevation layer the Geomodel is currently using to potentially provide a much richer environmental covariate surface to use in making species predictions. Also thanks for sharing this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.17179.pdf |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This discussion aims to scope how Clay could help iNaturalist (PoC @loarie).
One of their products is their Geomodel where they crunch the co-ocurrence of all the observation of 80k species with sufficient data (+ elevation). the model then infer new locations where a specie could be based on the presence of other species.
The trained model takes a location as input and returns the most likely species at that location as output.
How can Clay help iNaturalist?
Clay can provide an embedding for any location (and time) with the "semantics" learned from EO. One can imagine this as presence of forest types, roads, water, crops, ...
This input could be part of the training for the model. That should drastically increase the capacity to correlate local semantics with enabling conditions for species presence.
Is this a sensible expectation, @loarie?
If we provide the embeddgins, could you do a proof of concept? Or would you need anything else to test this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions