Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test mimisbrunnr as a extra layer of clinical significance for CNVs #217

Open
ViktorHy opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@ViktorHy
Copy link
Collaborator

In a recent case a known duplication was estimated as being 1000 basepair shorter than previously called. This resulted in annotsv missmatch to dbvar and gnomad which caused the variant to loose 6 points for clinical significance, gained 2 points in allelefrequency and lost 3 points for gene conq.

This all indicates that it failed to match previously known variants in annotsv.

For details about samples contact me.

@ViktorHy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh, and as I stated in title, one way to perhaps backup these cases in future could be to annotate svs with mimisbrunnr via svdb and adding the presence in mimisbrunnr to the clinical significance rank model category

@ViktorHy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Open for other solutions as well. In this specific case I feel like the overlap of the dup to a very specific disease causing gene should be caught by more than previous clincial findings

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant