Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plans to support bn254/bn128 #954

Open
shrimalmadhur opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Plans to support bn254/bn128 #954

shrimalmadhur opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys

Comments

@shrimalmadhur
Copy link

Are there any plans to support bn254/bn128 curve https://hackmd.io/@jpw/bn254 ?

@jframe jframe added the TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys label Dec 7, 2023
@gfukushima gfukushima added the question Further information is requested label Dec 10, 2023
@non-fungible-nelson
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there - can you describe the use-case you are looking to support with this signing curve?

@shrimalmadhur
Copy link
Author

@non-fungible-nelson we (at EigenLabs/EigenLayer) use bn254 signatures types for aggregation purpose but was looking for something to support as remote signer. Operators running EigenDA use bn254 keys to attest the data and we use those signatures to aggregate and post onchain.

@rohilsaraf97
Copy link

Hi @non-fungible-nelson, I wanted to check in on this issue. It seems important for our ongoing work, and I'd love to get any updates. Thanks!

@shrimalmadhur
Copy link
Author

@rohilsaraf97 we are working on a bn254 remote signer ourselves and just released an API spec - https://github.com/Layr-Labs/cerberus-api . Maybe this would be helpful to your project. we are gonna release the implementation soon which you can use. lmk if this helps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants