You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The user will likely create and edit Decapodes at the equation level. Therefore, having a way for a user to declare equations that are then compiled to work with Decapodes would be a big value add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this just writing the decapodes code itself? E.g.
Advection = @decapode begin
C::Form0
ϕ::Form1
V::Form1
ϕ == ∧₀₁(C,V)
end
So I think if the notebook let's you write Julia and the sysimage has the libraries loaded this should work out of the box, right?
If the user were to "load in" another decapode (e.g. #21) then they could compose this Advection decapode they craft in the notebook with, say, a Diffusion one they load in from Terarium.
@brandomr the idea here is that the DSL wouldn't be used and plain unicode/latex/mathml/something else could be used to declare the equation. The conversion to a Decapode should happen under the hood
The user will likely create and edit Decapodes at the equation level. Therefore, having a way for a user to declare equations that are then compiled to work with Decapodes would be a big value add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: