Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nerf TIAB, if possible #17

Open
Discomanco opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Nerf TIAB, if possible #17

Discomanco opened this issue Apr 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
adjustment Feature needs to be adjusted Config A change in configs Declined Change declined

Comments

@Discomanco
Copy link
Owner

Time in a Bottle could use a small nerf. I would like to keep its recipe early game, where it's most useful anyways. If the speed multiplier can be lowered, that will be the way to go

@Discomanco Discomanco added Config A change in configs adjustment Feature needs to be adjusted labels Apr 26, 2020
@Frikkle
Copy link

Frikkle commented Apr 27, 2020

As far as I could see there is this:

# How many ticks have to pass for a Time in a Bottle to gain 1 second (20 = 1 Second)
I:TimeInABottlePerSecond=20

So this does not change the acceleration rate, but the rate in which you "gain" time. We could set that to 200; meaning that you'd have to play for 10 hours to get 1 hours of time in your bottle.

@Radipon
Copy link

Radipon commented Apr 28, 2020

I don't feel that it deters from the pack in any way, as it makes the more engaging parts of the pack more accessible without changing crafting sequences. From playing through the pack multiple times, I honestly stopped using the item completely when autocrafting starts. The logistical complexity of manual crafting through the early chapters is barely changed, and I feel that it helps makes the most interesting parts of the pack easier to access, particularly if you found the pack through a channel like DW20 and were drawn in by the intensifying AE.

@AmyMialee
Copy link

It may be cheap and incredibly useful but in my opinion it's necessary. It removes a lot of the waiting of early game without being sheer overpowered and removing it entirely.

It fits very well into early game too, as later on it's easier to just make better faster machines than to babysit them with the bottle.

@Discomanco Discomanco added the Declined Change declined label Oct 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
adjustment Feature needs to be adjusted Config A change in configs Declined Change declined
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants