You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 28, 2023. It is now read-only.
I've recently posted an issue on the BFO GitHub page about the term 'part_of' (BFO:0000050). BFO-ontology/BFO#218
Apparently, it has been moved over to the Relationship Ontology but the prefix will remain as BFO rather than picking up a new RO prefix. When we use the OLS API to lookup the term and set the 'local' flag to true we receive no results. Would it be possible to set the flag for this term as being defined by the Relationship Ontology so our queries will return a result? I assume that there are more terms from the BFO that get pushed over to RO, but I don't know what all of those are.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've recently posted an issue on the BFO GitHub page about the term 'part_of' (BFO:0000050). BFO-ontology/BFO#218
Apparently, it has been moved over to the Relationship Ontology but the prefix will remain as BFO rather than picking up a new RO prefix. When we use the OLS API to lookup the term and set the 'local' flag to true we receive no results. Would it be possible to set the flag for this term as being defined by the Relationship Ontology so our queries will return a result? I assume that there are more terms from the BFO that get pushed over to RO, but I don't know what all of those are.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: