Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

BFO:0000050 #192

Closed
spficklin opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

BFO:0000050 #192

spficklin opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@spficklin
Copy link

spficklin commented Mar 2, 2018

I've recently posted an issue on the BFO GitHub page about the term 'part_of' (BFO:0000050). BFO-ontology/BFO#218

Apparently, it has been moved over to the Relationship Ontology but the prefix will remain as BFO rather than picking up a new RO prefix. When we use the OLS API to lookup the term and set the 'local' flag to true we receive no results. Would it be possible to set the flag for this term as being defined by the Relationship Ontology so our queries will return a result? I assume that there are more terms from the BFO that get pushed over to RO, but I don't know what all of those are.

Thanks

@simonjupp
Copy link
Contributor

We can update the RO config in OLS to reflect this. I'll just do it for part_of for now, but if there are others please let us know.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants