-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
POSSIBLE BUG - discrepancy between prod summary table data and expected from manual calculations #315
Comments
Test AnalysisHaving discussed the issue with @rstrange-scottlogic, it was actually an issue in my calculation that found the divergence - excel was treating long numbers as text and excluding them from the mean calculation. A change has been made where previously if the measured AQI and forecasted AQI were both 1 for the entire duration of the time, the UI picked the last entry, it now picks the first
Charter Re‐execute: Charter 28: Explore production summary table with reference to the database to discover accuracy ✅ |
All that is left is for this to undertake regression testing |
Frontend regression PASSED ✅ Playwright Regression 29.08.24.pdf Backend regression PASSED ✅ |
Observed variation between actual summary table data for London (forecast base time: 18 Aug 12:00, forecast window: 1), and expected data from a manual calculation.
Steps to reproduce:
at each 3hr increment, for each pollutant, average the data for the surrounding +/- 1.5hrs
calculate AQI
query forecast_data for:
Expected:
Actual:
Test Checklist:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: