-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Android support? #1084
Comments
One way you can try Privacy Badger on Android is via the WARP browser which includes a port of Privacy Badger 1.x (we'll also work with Qualcomm to get that up to 2.x) |
related to EFForg/privacybadgerfirefox-legacy#271 which is marked "wontfix", but apparently just because it's the legacy repository. :-) So there's hope! |
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/privacy-badger17/ It's right there |
... Note it was only made available on Android just a week ago. There's no user interface so I can't really tell if it's doing anything. The only thing I notice is on a rooted phone is this file file:///data/data/org.mozilla.firefox/files/mozilla/(profile name).default/browser-extension-data/jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ%40jetpack/storage.js But the file doesn't look like it's logging anything as the desktop version does. It just has this after a few days of browsing. On the desktop this would be full of logged sites: {"snitch_map":{},"action_map":{},"cookieblock_list":{},"supercookie_domains":{},"dnt_hashes":{},"settings_map":{}} |
@jawz101 thanks. So it's... totally busted? When I visit the project home page in Firefox 51 for Android this is what I see: This just after your big launch announcement. There's.... a lot of opportunity being left on the table here. Negative first impressions can be hard to reverse. Does this project have full-time maintainers? If not, how can users like myself help fund the hiring of them? Privacy can be a business, too, just like advertising. |
P.S. I just downloaded WARP. It's cool niche product for the determined user, but the design/marketing is painfully amateur. It's hard to see this becoming a mainstream product with a global impact. I'd love to see a clearer path towards mass adoption on mobile. |
Well, I just go straight to the Firefox AMO page. Also, I don't even know if Firefox for Android is indeed e10s yet. When I go to about:support it still says multiprocess is disabled by add-ons. Now I think half of the problem is Mozilla still hasn't rolled e10s out to the mobile Firefox. |
Hi all, |
@cooperq check my post above. I can actually find Privacy Badger on the AMO mobile site while on my Android phone, install it, just doesn't do anything https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/privacy-badger17/ |
@cooperq Thanks for the response. I'm new to WebExtensions, but I'm looking at: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2016/04/29/webextensions-in-firefox-48/ which says:
So is the lack of UI support the holdup? Is there a way to end-run around this, so that some version of PB2 can run on Fennec for the year 2017, before full support arrives? |
I briefly looked into this. A list of implemented Web Extension features on Android can be found on MDN. For the back-end, I didn't check which ones are necessary for Privacy Badger to work. For UI, the only currently implemented user-initiated UI element is The |
Cool, I'll be sure to consult how uBlock did the UI on Android when I get to working on our port. The reason I haven't jumped on porting Privacy Badger to Firefox on Android is we still have some major bugs and performance issues on the desktop. For example, I'm currently working on fixing a tracking mis-attribution bug (Badger incorrectly attributes tracking to non-tracking domains) that seems responsible for a good chunk of our broken site backlog. I hear you are frustrated and I am sorry about that, but try to see things from my perspective. Having working tests is essential to keeping a project like this (tiny team, open source) going effectively in the future. There is much to do besides implementing Badger on Firefox for Android, a platform with a pretty small market share. If you'd like to see a certain feature get implemented, you could make a case for making that feature higher priority. You could report how your experience using Privacy Badger on Firefox for Android went. I know there is no UI, but it sounds like you installed and used it for a while (thanks to an |
@jawz101 another really great way to contribute would be to write an Android UI yourself. Or find someone who's willing to. |
@ghostwords @strugee As for the FFox for Android add-on- right now it looks like it simply doesn't write anything to the storage.js file found in The file gets created on app install but nothing is logged as I browse. |
Hey @ShapeShifter499! Please don't add +1 comments, as they don't contribute anything to the discussion and just generate more email for the maintainers (and those who are subscribed to this issue) to go through. Instead, you can support issues by using GitHub's reactions feature (smiley icon at the top-right of each comment). |
Did something change recently? Going to the official Privacy Badger site at EFF on Firefox for Android no longer displays that it's not compatible. |
Yep, there were some fixes made to the website. Visiting on Android should suggest a couple of existing privacy tools for Android, but that may not yet be working. |
I was interested in the current state of WebExtensions within Android and checked if it was possible to make this plugin work with reasonable ease. Unfortanelly it still has some "small" issues.
Unfortanelly if you want to make this extension work within android right now, you will break it for other browsers and the current UI of the plugin doesn't help either. I did make a fork (with no extra comments 😑 ) for everyone who is interested. https://github.com/lemnis/privacybadger |
Very cool, @lemnis, thank you for your work! Which parts of your WIP Android fork are incompatible with existing browsers? When you say Badger's current UI is problematic for Android, what are the problems? |
#1516 Added a pull request because we can add Android support without breaking it for other browsers. As result, I had to remove 1 feature compared to my previous commit/post. Full detail:
Tested in Firefox for Android 56.0a1 (2017-07-18), should work from 55+. Did check chrome and firefox desktop, didn't see anything unexpected. |
Runs on my phone, I'll report back in case anything is nor working as expected. |
I just installed the bèta.. worked perfectly for a little while. But now there is no longer menu item for Privacy Badger where I can see the trackers and such. Android Samsung S7, and Firefox 57.0.4 |
ok, a full phone restart brings back the menu entry :) |
Resolving for now, as there aren't any clear followups at this point. |
Hi guys,
So, I was psyched to get the EFF email about the PB 2.0 release. But, I've got a Android phone. I've visited the PB install page in Firefox, Chrome, and Opera, and PB doesn't seem to be supported in any Android browser. W...... T....... F........ Am I missing something?
I love EFF. I want to see this project to succeed, beyond all of our wildest imaginations. But I have to scratch my head at the allocation of resources here. Mobile usage is approaching double that of desktop. We'll cross that line soon if we haven't already:
http://marketingland.com/digital-growth-now-coming-mobile-usage-comscore-171505
Is developing for desktop just easier? Why was a desktop release developed and released first? Mobile first, please!
I will donate hard cash towards a crowdfunding campaign for an Android release that has defined thresholds and deliverable dates. I'm sure I'm not alone. Tell me where to go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: