As a User/Registered User, I want to Access data/datasets (Products) referenced in EarthCODE Catalogue on CDSE, so that I can view them on CDSE

[JanssenBrm]

Acceptance criteria:

• As a User/Registered User I can use the EarthCODE Catalog to discover the STAC metadata for a product and then use the reference to the product to develop a new experiment/workflow in CDSE.

[JanssenBrm]

@GarinSmith - What would be the use case or user flow for the discovery of the products on the EarthCODE catalogue? Are users expected to go to the EarthCODE catalogue to discover what is there? How is this different from the experiment result, mentioned in #10?

[JanssenBrm]

Comment from @GarinSmith

@JanssenBrm - This is a good point.
I think we have some flexibility to agree how this works as this forms part of the 3rd milestone of work.
I think this user story is more focused on the experimental result itself.
I think #10 could be more focused on the experiment itself.

As such, a done criteria for this story could be either:
Done criteria 1 : "As a User/Registered User, I can see the STAC metadata in the catalog that was published from CDSE for a product."
However, I think this could be part of the done criteria for https://github.com/orgs/ESA-EarthCODE/projects/7/views/12?pane=issue&itemId=82643597

Done criteria 2: "As a User/Registered User I can use the Catalog to discover the STAC metadata that was published from CDSE for a product and then access that product in CDSE".
Note that later on this might also be implemented in the PRR (unless we decide to do this first).

@edobrowolska and @dgiomo please comment. We can also discuss this at the next Scrum of Scrums. This is partly informed by the metadata examples that the platforms use to describe produts and experimemst/workflows.

[JanssenBrm]

I believe "Done Criteria 1" could also be covered in #9. For "Done criteria 2" we should define the scope of "assessing the product". From our side, it could mean:

As a User/Registered User I can use the Catalog to discover the STAC metadata that was published from CDSE for a product and then use the reference to the product to develop a new experiment/workflow in CDSE".

Similar to the comment at #10 (comment)

[GarinSmith]

I agree with the points above. Done criteria 2 is applicable to this user story. Done criteria 1 applicable elsewhere.
Also, this story is related to Products and so I will update it to reflect that.

[JanssenBrm]

Great, thank you for the quick feedback @GarinSmith - I have updated the main description of this ticket accordingly. Feel free to comment if any other criteria are applicable.