You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it be possible to get this working with spherical / equirectangular camera positions exported from Metashape? Colmap doesn't support 360 images, so would be amazing if your script worked for this!
Here is a snippet from the xml, which is quite different to the regular "frame" type.
Ah, that's a shame. Metashape Pro does a great job with equirectangular images and it would be amazing to export the cameras for instant-ngp somehow (before my Pro trial runs out haha).
I have tried splitting the equirectangulars into cubemaps using a few different methods, but Metashape usually fails to align these as there isn't enough overlap.
Hey,
Would it be possible to get this working with spherical / equirectangular camera positions exported from Metashape? Colmap doesn't support 360 images, so would be amazing if your script worked for this!
Here is a snippet from the xml, which is quite different to the regular "frame" type.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <document version="1.5.0"> <chunk label="Chunk 1" enabled="true"> <sensors next_id="1"> <sensor id="0" label="unknown" type="spherical"> <resolution width="5760" height="2880"/> <property name="layer_index" value="0"/> <bands> <band label="Red"/> <band label="Green"/> <band label="Blue"/> </bands> <data_type>uint8</data_type> <black_level>0 0 0</black_level> <sensitivity>1 1 1</sensitivity> </sensor> </sensors> <components next_id="1" active_id="0"> <component id="0" label="Component 1"> <region> <center>-8.9246900915267902e-01 2.0682838682109413e+01 2.5898418643679420e+01</center> <size>1.5354224936167401e+02 6.7941420046488446e+01 6.0285307184855142e+01</size> <R>-4.0138366329283741e-02 8.4499921858002310e-03 -9.9915840044533299e-01 -9.9821655039162638e-01 -4.4561741820354980e-02 3.9723666625547417e-02 -4.4188574005706568e-02 9.9897089487031399e-01 1.0223557568002074e-02</R> </region> <partition> <camera_ids>0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89</camera_ids> </partition> </component> </components> <cameras next_id="90" next_group_id="0"> <camera id="0" sensor_id="0" component_id="0" label="output_0001"> <transform>9.9959579221709571e-01 2.4701712245502279e-02 1.4074004192741969e-02 7.8205878137425722e-01 2.4443283329927897e-02 -9.9953467003790475e-01 1.8247446184902816e-02 -1.5206475018149446e-01 1.4518198301779174e-02 -1.7896055553066947e-02 -9.9973444129614353e-01 6.6758626639336242e+01 0 0 0 1</transform> </camera>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: