Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

So how about the feats2joints? #164

Open
Gelercatty opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

So how about the feats2joints? #164

Gelercatty opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Gelercatty
Copy link

I am very concerned about the two processed data. One is the high-dimensional representation of actions, feats(joints_vec), and the other is the restoration of it to skeletal 3D coordinates, joints. By reviewing your processing code, I understand that feats2joints is relatively easy to implement. Is there a method to achieve joints2feats? This would allow for comparisons between the generated results of different models. Looking forward to your reply! Sincerely!

@Gelercatty Gelercatty changed the title So how about the feats2joints? So how about the joints2feats? Nov 20, 2024
@Gelercatty Gelercatty changed the title So how about the joints2feats? So how about the feats2joints? Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant