You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am very concerned about the two processed data. One is the high-dimensional representation of actions, feats(joints_vec), and the other is the restoration of it to skeletal 3D coordinates, joints. By reviewing your processing code, I understand that feats2joints is relatively easy to implement. Is there a method to achieve joints2feats? This would allow for comparisons between the generated results of different models. Looking forward to your reply! Sincerely!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Gelercatty
changed the title
So how about the feats2joints?
So how about the joints2feats?
Nov 20, 2024
Gelercatty
changed the title
So how about the joints2feats?
So how about the feats2joints?
Nov 20, 2024
I am very concerned about the two processed data. One is the high-dimensional representation of actions, feats(joints_vec), and the other is the restoration of it to skeletal 3D coordinates, joints. By reviewing your processing code, I understand that feats2joints is relatively easy to implement. Is there a method to achieve joints2feats? This would allow for comparisons between the generated results of different models. Looking forward to your reply! Sincerely!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: