You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When exploring options for data provenance provision, I recently came across an interesting new activity under OGC integrating the concepts from the W3C PROV-O Provenance Ontology within a STAC provenance extension. As this is one of the bits where we'd need to propose something to STAC anyway, I'd prefer to utilize this approach (PROV-O has long been respected within the scientific community)
Input Term
multiplicity
Notes
currently implemented STAC name
PROV-O element
Comment KS
Origin
0...1
EO-based, produced by countries
stac:provenance_name
Think this may be a duplicate of Data Source, thus could be cut
Note: the way PROV-O is designed, the concepts can link either directly to an external resource. I'd link to the STAC records for source data and a/p processing resources. See the first example for direct linking
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When exploring options for data provenance provision, I recently came across an interesting new activity under OGC integrating the concepts from the W3C PROV-O Provenance Ontology within a STAC provenance extension. As this is one of the bits where we'd need to propose something to STAC anyway, I'd prefer to utilize this approach (PROV-O has long been respected within the scientific community)
Note: the way PROV-O is designed, the concepts can link either directly to an external resource. I'd link to the STAC records for source data and a/p processing resources. See the first example for direct linking
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: