You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In practice, I doubt anyone uses shared secrets of more than 256 characters. However, a Google search provided some empirical information about maximal lengths for various implementations. The AWS Directory Service is documented to have an exceptional upper limit of 512.
We can update the length to 512, but I doubt many people will use it. There really is little point to any shared secret longer than 256 characters. If people are that worried about security, they should use TLS.
Thanks for your reply, but it still doesn't change the fact that my client is allready running this on multiple locations from different suppliers, and only Unifi doesn't support this while Microsoft RADIUS server does go up to 128 chars. I can't change the source. Can only ask Ubiquity to follow Microsoft standards.
In practice, I doubt anyone uses shared secrets of more than 256 characters. However, a Google search provided some empirical information about maximal lengths for various implementations. The AWS Directory Service is documented to have an exceptional upper limit of 512.
From the AWS Directory Service Documentation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: