Is issue #833 back again?

[richb201]

I just added a third tenant and i am seeing this:
A 404 status code is returned from the Start Passwordless API when more than one tenant exists in FusionAuth.

This was solved in "Resolves GitHub Issue #833, thanks to @atrauzzi for reporting and helping us track this one down!"
This was reported solve din 1.19.0. I am using 1.19.7 and also experience this (it is repeatable). Can this be?

Please advise.

[robotdan]

In general, you should use a tenantId on the request when you have more than one tenant. However, in most cases we can resolve the correct Tenant Id - the issue you mentioned (FusionAuth/fusionauth-issues#833) allows us to correctly resolve the Tenant from the applicationId on the request.

Can you confirm you are using the 1.19.7 version of the client and the FusionAuth server? Also, please provide an example JSON request that is causing a 404.

[richb201]

Hi Dan. Here is a screenshot of the UI showing vers 1.19.7. Here is the call and the response. You can see the request in the json of the call: Here is the call: $result = $_SESSION['client']->withTenantId('8ea1c784-866b-4755-b97b-b4fda2ad19e4')->startPasswordlesslogin($requestJ); Here is the $result I am seeing: FusionAuth\ClientResponse Object ( [errorResponse] => [exception] => [method] => POST [request] => {" applicationId":"2cf00c29-ac46-49bf-8cd4-32538ddb00d8","loginId":"[email protected] ","state":{"redirect_uri":" http://substantiator-survey.ngrok.io/index.php/Configure/report_generator_amazing","client_id":"2cf00c29-ac46-49bf-8cd4-32538ddb00d8","response_type":"code","scope":"openid","state":"[email protected] "}} [successResponse] => [status] => 404 ) We were trying to nail down the problem to the fact that I am using multiple tenants, but the 404 response is returned regardless.

[robotdan]

The only reason 404 would be returned is if the applicationId of 2cf00c29-ac46-49bf-8cd4-32538ddb00d8 does not exist or is disabled, or if a user [email protected].

You can confirm the user exists, and the applicationId is correct, and ensure the loginId does not contain any trailing whitespace or other characters.

Does the issue go away if you provide a tenantId on the request?

[richb201]

No, the problem did not go away with a tenantId. I don't think the appid is disabled (i will check). I will also check out to make sure the user exists and there is no trailing spaces, tomorrow. You saw the version in that image of the UI? Is that a confirmation of the actual a version?

[robotdan]

I don't think your screenshot came through, you may want to comment directly on the issue, I think the email responses lose some things. #22

[richb201]

Ok, thanks. Yes. On the Home/System/About screen the version shows as 1.19.7

…

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 7:26 PM Daniel DeGroff ***@***.***> wrote: I don't think your screenshot came through, you may want to comment directly on the issue, I think the email responses lose some things. #22 <#22> — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVBHGNZHLBQRN563VGMHRTSXJXUVANCNFSM4VKDPGHA> .

[richb201]

Dan, I checked the loginId which is "[email protected]". You can see that there are no extra spaces in that. I have copied the "source" from the UI below. The email address is a valid loginId, right? I also checked the application ID and it is fine. Please advise. { "active" : true, "connectorId" : "e3306678-a53a-4964-9040-1c96f36dda72", "data" : { "admin_email" : "[email protected]", "email" : "[email protected]" }, "email" : "[email protected]", "id" : "15418631-8d91-4acf-afee-1e5312f2fb2b", "insertInstant" : 1609037772287, "lastUpdateInstant" : 1609272795838, "passwordChangeRequired" : false, "passwordLastUpdateInstant" : 1609037772351, "registrations" : [ { "applicationId" : "95b1cc05-cad3-496e-9fc5-e8e3521b1b85", "id" : "a9fd1cce-7831-4e0b-b3ff-80dd7521c289", "insertInstant" : 1609037772361, "lastLoginInstant" : 1609037772363, "lastUpdateInstant" : 1609037772361, "usernameStatus" : "ACTIVE", "verified" : true } ], "tenantId" : "34303566-6466-3234-6565-656233663263", "twoFactorDelivery" : "None", "twoFactorEnabled" : false, "usernameStatus" : "ACTIVE", "verified" : true } On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:11 PM Richard Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:

…

Ok, thanks. Yes. On the Home/System/About screen the version shows as 1.19.7 On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 7:26 PM Daniel DeGroff ***@***.***> wrote: > I don't think your screenshot came through, you may want to comment > directly on the issue, I think the email responses lose some things. #22 > <#22> > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#22 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVBHGNZHLBQRN563VGMHRTSXJXUVANCNFSM4VKDPGHA> > . >