-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New heat stress data #14
Comments
100% yes.
|
That's a very good point, and the probabilistic layer of extreme heat would be quite useful. |
Thanks Arthur for successfully completing the analysis! We now have daily min and max over period 1940-2020 in °C for 10 return periods (5, 10, 20, 50, 75, 100, 200, 250, 500, 1000 years). Most likely we will only consider up to RP100. Preview of RP 20 daily MAX (°C) Compared with RP 20 WBGT, seems very consistent: Additional indices to be produced:
A short tech doc will be added to the data. |
Please do
…________________________________
From: Mattia Amadio ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 9:55:05 AM
To: GFDRR/CCDR-tools ***@***.***>
Cc: Stuart Fraser ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [GFDRR/CCDR-tools] New heat stress data (Issue #14)
Thanks Arthur for successfully completing the analysis!
We now have daily min and max over period 1940-2020 in °C for 10 return periods (5, 10, 20, 50, 75, 100, 200, 250, 500, 1000 years). Most likely we will only consider up to RP100.
Preview of RP 10 daily MAX (°C)
[immagine]<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/44863827/203516467-60459155-1854-4d45-a6fd-3897bae0c0d8.png>
Additional indices to be produced:
* Mean
* Days above/below thresholds - TBD
A short tech doc will be added to the data.
@stufraser1<https://github.com/stufraser1> can I share with you for review?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#14 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7PNYUNEFINJLIX7JZ4HJTWJXSXTANCNFSM6AAAAAARXBR34Y>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
From Nick:
Link to labour loss functions in publications by Kjellstrom or other authors. Intensity categories are defined under ISO standards. Existing global datasets on heat hazardMore to be added, eg. the dataset the NBS team uses in their scans. Perhaps we can ask an STC to develop out the table.
|
We have quite outdated and low-res WBGT layers from VITO analysis.
WBGT considers heavy labour under heat conditions, hence it is good to measure impact on health,
but it doesn't match with physical temperature and thus 1) generates a bit of confusion in the map interpretation 2) cannot be applied to other exp categories such as crop. Also, does not cover extreme cold.
We should explore the chance to switch to another metric, or add another metric: Universal Thermal Climate Index
More details about the indicator and thresholds
Even more details
We would also have the projections from Copernicus.
However, it would need to be turned into a probabilistic layer of extremes. See #16
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: