You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some background for those that need to run CodeXL but it fails:
To get the parameters that the CodeXL is executing, I used ProcMon from Windows (Sysinternals Suite). It was a bit tricky, but I found the "Process Create", monitoring both "CodeXL" and "conhost" when I launched the Perf Counters. Then, I did manual tests with that specific arguments and rcprof-x64, finding that the error was the -k all.
Then, temporarily, to bypass this bug with -k all, I created a script (e.g. python, then converted to rcprof-x64.exe) that parses the arguments and removes the -k all. Then, it launches a subprocess, calling the original rcprof-x64.exe (eg. renamed to rcprof-x64.real.exe). Although it is a bit slower, it can work directly from CodeXL.
I don't know if this is the expected behavior, but in Windows, when running
-k all
, it fails:Failed to generate profile result
.I need to write
-k cl
or leave that option empty to be able to generate the profile data.Since it fails, CodeXL has also this bug because it executes
rcprof-x64.exe
with that option forced.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: