You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a FedRAMP stakeholder, I need the example SSP to demonstrate how to document a FedRAMP inventory in OSCAL so that I the inventories I create and submit to FedRAMP meets their requirements.
Goals
Currently, the <implemented-component> assemblies in the example FedRAMP SSP have invalid component-uuids. The inventory items all reference the following UUIDs, but there are no components in the example SSP that have those UUIDs:
11111111-2222-4000-8000-009000000007
11111111-2222-4000-8000-009000000008
11111111-2222-4000-8000-009000000011
11111111-2222-4000-8000-009000000018
Need to fix all implemented-component/@component-uuid references to point to valid components.
Additional, we may need to add a constraint in the core OSCAL metaschema to ensure that whenever an inventory-item has an implemented-component/@component-uuid reference, it must reference a valid component UUID. We could add this (temporarily) in the FedRAMP external constraints as a workaround.
This is a ...
fix - something needs to be different
This relates to ...
User Story
As a FedRAMP stakeholder, I need the example SSP to demonstrate how to document a FedRAMP inventory in OSCAL so that I the inventories I create and submit to FedRAMP meets their requirements.
Goals
Currently, the
<implemented-component>
assemblies in the example FedRAMP SSP have invalidcomponent-uuid
s. The inventory items all reference the following UUIDs, but there are no components in the example SSP that have those UUIDs:Need to fix all
implemented-component/@component-uuid
references to point to valid components.Additional, we may need to add a constraint in the core OSCAL metaschema to ensure that whenever an
inventory-item
has animplemented-component/@component-uuid
reference, it must reference a valid component UUID. We could add this (temporarily) in the FedRAMP external constraints as a workaround.Dependencies
No response
Acceptance Criteria
Other information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: