diff --git a/apps/fishing-map/public/locales/fr/data-terminology.json b/apps/fishing-map/public/locales/fr/data-terminology.json
index 93602ed217..15e4756d61 100644
--- a/apps/fishing-map/public/locales/fr/data-terminology.json
+++ b/apps/fishing-map/public/locales/fr/data-terminology.json
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@
"encounter": "
Overview
- Encounter events describe when AIS data shows two vessels that appear to be meeting at sea. Encounter events can be indicative of potential transshipment events.
- Global Fishing Watch records an event as an encounter when two vessels are detected within 500 meters of each other for at least 2 hours, travelling at a median speed of less than 2 knots, whilst at least 10 kilometers (5.4 nautical miles) from a coastal anchorage.
- Currently, encounter events are shown between carrier and fishing vessels and support and fishing vessels. In the future, encounters between other vessel types may be displayed.
- View details on the encounter, such as location of the event and details of the encountered vessel, by clicking on the ‘i’ icon associated with the encounter.
Caveats
- There may be many other reasons (i.e. not transhipment activity) why two vessels encounter each other at sea. Vessels may have encounters to exchange equipment or for crew safety.
- Given the different reasons that vessels may meet at sea, these events are intended to support further review of activity and should not be used in isolation.
- Sometimes transhipment events fall below the criteria used to define an encounter event, and therefore may not appear in our data. It is important to corroborate encounter events with other sources of information, such as RFMO transhipment records.
- If transmission data is poor, the average location can be inconsistent with the vessel track and the event may appear slightly alongside the track.
- Not all encounters are shown in vessel viewer. Currently, encounter events are shown between carrier and fishing vessels and support and fishing vessels. In the future, encounters between other vessel types may be displayed.
Learn more
You can read more about transshipment behaviour from our report scientific publication.
",
"loitering": "Vue d'ensemble
- Les événements de dérive sont enregistrés lorsqu'un navire présente des signes de rencontres potentielles ou de rencontre avec un autre navire en mer, mais qu'aucun deuxième navire n'est détecté.
- Les événements de dérive sont basés sur la vitesse et la distance par rapport au rivage.
- Un événement de dérive est enregistré lorsqu'un navire se déplace à une vitesse moyenne inférieure à 2 nœuds à au moins 20 milles marins (37,04 kilomètres) du rivage.
- Il peut y avoir de nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles un événement de dérive est enregistré, les résultats doivent donc être interprétés avec prudence.
Mises en garde
- Il peut y avoir de nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles un navire ralentit en s'éloignant du rivage.
- Les événements de dérive sont indicatifs et le navire peut ne pas rencontrer d'autres navires au moment de l'événement.
- D'autres événements dans lesquels un navire peut rester assez stationnaire ou se déplacer lentement incluent la maintenance, le mauvais temps ou l'attente des instructions du propriétaire.
- Les événements de dérive des navires de pêche peuvent être associés au comportement de pêche normal, car les navires de pêche se déplacent souvent lentement pendant les opérations de pêche.
- En raison des définitions individuelles des événements de dérive et des événements de rencontre, il est possible qu'un événement de dérive chevauche un événement de rencontre, représentant la même activité, ou l'événement de dérive peut englober un ou plusieurs événements de rencontre.
- Si les données de transmission sont médiocres, l'emplacement moyen peut ne pas correspondre à la trajectoire du navire et l'événement peut apparaître légèrement à côté du tracé.
",
"fishing": "Présentation
- Global Fishing Watch analyse les données AIS collectées auprès des navires que nos recherches ont identifiés comme étant des navires de pêche connus ou potentiels, et applique un algorithme de détection de pêche pour déterminer « l'activité de pêche apparente » en fonction de changements dans la vitesse et la direction du navire.
- Notre modèle d'apprentissage automatique classe chaque point de données AIS diffusé pour ces navires comme étant apparemment en train de pêcher ou ne pêchant pas.
- Les événements de pêche utilisent ces points de données comme entrée et les résument en un seul événement pour une analyse plus facile.
- Un événement de pêche est défini lorsque :
- Les positions de pêche apparaissent consécutivement et sont séparées de moins de 10 kilomètres ou 2 heures ; et,
- Les positions de pêche dans une plage de temps d'une heure et un rayon de deux kilomètres d'un autre événement de pêche sont regroupées en un seul événement.
- L'ensemble de données est en outre restreint en supprimant les événements de pêche qui sont brefs et rapides, car ils sont moins susceptibles d'indiquer un événement de pêche réaliste. Les événements de pêche courts suivants sont supprimés :
- Événements d'une durée inférieure à 20 minutes ;
- Événements comprenant cinq positions de pêche ou moins ;
- Événements qui couvrent une distance de moins de 0,5 km (pour tous les engins, à l'exception des engins estimés cibler le calmar) ;
- Événements couvrant une distance inférieure à 50 m (pour les engins de pêche estimés cibler le calmar ) ; et
- Événements de navires se déplaçant anormalement rapidement avec une vitesse moyenne du navire de 10 nœuds ou plus.
Mises en garde
- Des faux résultats positifs peuvent apparaître dans l'ensemble de données lorsque les navires ralentissent et changent de direction, mais ne sont pas engagés dans une activité de pêche.
- Notre modèle d'apprentissage automatique est plus efficace pour prédire certains types de pêche (par exemple, le chalutage et la palangre) par rapport à d'autres types de pêche qui n'étaient peut-être pas aussi présents dans les données utilisées pour entraîner le modèle d'apprentissage automatique
- La plupart des dispositifs AIS appartiennent à l'une des trois « classes » : classe A, classe B et classe B+. Les appareils de classe A diffusent avec une puissance plus élevée et diffusent la position d’un navire plus fréquemment. Les appareils de classe B et B+ de faible puissance sont détectés moins fréquemment par les satellites et il peut donc sembler qu'il y ait moins d'activité de pêche dans les zones où ils sont principalement utilisés.
- Outre les zones à faible couverture satellite, les zones à forte densité de trafic maritime peuvent également limiter le nombre de signaux traités, notamment liés aux systèmes AIS de classe B (ou B+). Cela peut conduire à une activité réduite ou sous-estimée des navires dans la carte ou les données de Global Fishing Watch dans ces zones.
En savoir plus
En savoir plus sur notre estimation de l'effort de pêche apparent.",
- "insightsCoverage": "Overview
The coverage metric is an estimate of how well a vessel’s activities outside of port, i.e. where it travelled and what it did, can be captured by the vessel’s AIS data for the time range of interest. A vessel’s AIS coverage metric is critical to interpreting vessel activity information. The higher the coverage percentage, the greater confidence on the accuracy of events listed to represent the vessel’s actual activities. To calculate the coverage metric, all voyages linked to a vessel in the selected time range are segmented into one hour blocks, and the proportion of each hour block a vessel in a voyage has at least one AIS transmission. An ‘N/A’ value could be due to no reported activity for the vessel in the selected time range. This could be of poor coverage, but may also be the result of inactivity e.g. the vessel undergoing maintenance. In these cases, we recommend you check additional information sources and request supporting records from the vessel.
Caveats
- As the AIS coverage metric is calculated based on voyages, eg. the vessel’s activity between port visits, coverage is reflective of the time and AIS reception quality while a vessel is active at sea rather than at port.
- Voyage is defined based on port visits (exit and entry). Any issue detecting port visits for a vessel may result in lower accuracy of the AIS coverage calculation.
- The coverage metric does not distinguish between a lack of activity (non-event) and poor transmission resulting in disability to detect a true event.
Learn more
Learn more about our work on transmission gaps
",
- "insightsFishing": "Overview
Global Fishing Watch (GFW) analyzes and applies a fishing detection algorithm based on AIS data collected from vessels. Each AIS broadcast data point is classified as either “apparently fishing” or not fishing, and further reviewed to determine individual “fishing events”.
Based on the time range of interest, the following two insights are reviewed:
- Any apparent fishing events detected in areas with no known RFMO authorization
- Any apparent fishing events detected in no-take MPAs
Fishing in areas with no known RFMO authorization
GFW indicates any apparent fishing events in areas with no known RFMO authorization compiled from 7 Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) lists*.
Caveats
- The insight covers the listed RFMO areas only*.
- The insight does not include national registration or licensing lists.
Fishing in no-take Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
This insight is presented by cross-referencing any apparent fishing events in the boundaries of no-take MPAs (Source: World Database on Protected Areas ).
Caveats
- Events close to boundary lines may be reported as being inside an MPA boundary. We recommend that you check the vessel track positions on the map alongside adding the MPA layer to confirm exact operation.
- There may be variability in no-take MPA permissions and restrictions based on seasonal closures and gear restrictions.
General caveats
- Due to limited access to national databases, the insights do not consider other unknown authorizations e.g. seasonal closures, fishing authorisation within EEZs.
- All references to activity events (e.g. fishing), should be understood in the context of GFW's algorithms, which are best efforts to determine apparent fishing activity events based on AIS data collected.
- While the insights provide potential events, GFW recommends to visually inspect vessel tracks, always refer to additional information sources, and request records from a vessel to confirm any findings.
* The 7 RFMO lists considered for the authorization insight include:
- Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
- International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
- Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
- North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
- South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
- Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
Learn more
Learn more about how apparent fishing is estimated through Global Fishing Watch’s technology , and the difference between apparent fishing effort and fishing events. ",
- "insightsFlagsChanges": "Overview
This insight tracks and details when the registry information available on a vessel indicates the vessel has been flagged to more than one unique flag state during the time range of interest, indicating a potential flag change. Adjust the end date of the time bar to present date to show the current vessel flag; Extend time range to track historical changes.
Caveats
- Global Fishing Watch matches vessel identity data with over 40 public registries to validate an individual vessel and enable tracking of identity and activity changes throughout the vessel’s lifetime from construction to scrapping.
- The vessel identity insights rely solely on registry data. The insights do not consider AIS based vessel flag identity.
- The quantity and quality of available registry data vary by flag state, thereby introducing uneven degrees of vessel identity information.
- Conflicts between information sources can occur leading to incorrect identification of vessel flags. This is more common for vessels not listed on public registries and vessels operating under multiple flags within a short time range.
- While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed, particularly on any changes outside of the monthly data update cycle.
Learn more
Global Fishing Watch works to offset the lack of public registry data by complementing with other data sources and advocating for transparency in regional and national fora. Learn more about:
Vessel identity and characterization ",
- "insightsGaps": "Overview
AIS devices are designed to continually broadcast a vessel’s position to avoid collisions. Thus, when a vessel has an extended gap in AIS transmissions or positions, it can potentially indicate intentional AIS disabling or suspicious behavior.
The AIS off events insight is based on the time range of interest.
Global Fishing Watch records all AIS gap events over six hours, and then applies a set of filters below to identify those gaps we believe to be intentional AIS disabling rather than technical failures. The filter criteria for ‘likely disabling’ are:
- The gap event must be at least 12 hours;
- The gap must start at least 50 nautical miles (nm) from shore;
- The gap must start in an area with a satellite reception quality greater than 10 positions per day;
- The vessel must have at least 14 satellite positions in the 12 hours prior to the gap.
Caveats
- The dataset used to formulate this insight remains in prototype stage, which means it is still under quality assurance processes with possibility of data issues and may not include the most up-to-date data points or changes.
- Gaps outside of the above filter criteria (e.g. activity within 50 nm) are not recognised. Using this AIS off events insight to evaluate activity within 50 nm from shore for example would be uninformative and potentially misleading.
- Gaps shorter than 12 hours are not considered for this insight due to variability of satellite orbit timings.
- Gap events less than 50 nm from shore (inshore) are also not considered, due to differences in satellite and terrestrial AIS with satellite AIS reception generally decreases closer to shore coupled by higher vessel density resulting in signal interference.
- The AIS reception quality estimates used to identify the insights are based on data for 2017- 2019 from Welch et al. (2022) while we work to automate monthly estimates from 2019 until present day.
- While the insight aims to provide ‘likely AIS disabling’ events, the insight is unable to confirm whether the gap events are intentional.
- We recommend referencing additional information sources and request supporting records from the vessel for comprehensive AIS gap events review.
",
- "insightsMOUList": "TOKYO AND/OR PARIS MOU LISTS
Overview
This insight tracks and details when the registry information on a vessel's identity indicates a flag record matching a flag on the Tokyo and/or Paris MOU Black or Grey lists based on your time range of interest. Adjust the end date of the time bar to present date to show the current vessel flag status; Extend time range to track historical changes.
Caveats
- Global Fishing Watch matches vessel identity data with over 40 public registries to validate an individual vessel and enable tracking of identity and activity changes throughout the vessel’s lifetime from construction to scrapping.
- The vessel identity insights rely solely on registry data. The insights do not consider AIS based vessel flag identity.
- The Tokyo and Paris MOU lists have been obtained consistently by GFW since mid-2021, and the insight is based on flag identity on and after 2021, not before.
- The data is maintained on an annual basis.
- While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed, particularly on any changes outside of the annual data update cycle.
",
- "insightsIUU": "Overview
This insight presents illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) listing status according to the official Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO) IUU vessel lists. A vessel is defined as ‘currently listed’ if they were present on an RFMO IUU vessel list during your time range of interest. To view the vessel’s latest status, please adjust the end date of the timebar to the present date. Vessels that were on the RFMO IUU list in the past and have since been delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service), or have never been listed are indicated as ‘not listed’.
Caveats
- This insight is kept up-to-date periodically since 2017.
- The insight includes data from 13 official RFMO IUU vessel lists* only. Vessels that have a history of suspected or proven IUU or other non-compliance, but have never been listed by the relevant RFMOs will not be flagged here.
- IUU-listed and IUU-engaged vessels tend to change identities, locations, and operations frequently to evade detection. While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed due to delays, reporting or administrative errors resulting in incorrect display of information at the RFMO and/or in this Global Fishing Watch insight.
- Global Fishing Watch recommends to always refer to additional data sources, including verification of the original data source*, and/or request additional records from a vessel to confirm any findings.
* The 13 RFMO IUU vessel lists considered for this insight include: (Date source: TMT Combined IUU Vessel List )
- Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
- Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
- General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
- International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
- Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
- Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
- North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
- North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
- South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
- South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
- Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
- Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
"
+ "insightsCoverage": "Overview
The coverage metric is an estimate of how well a vessel’s activities outside of port, i.e. where it travelled and what it did, can be captured by the vessel’s AIS data for the time range of interest. A vessel’s AIS coverage metric is critical to interpreting vessel activity information. The higher the coverage percentage, the greater confidence on the accuracy of events listed to represent the vessel’s actual activities. To calculate the coverage metric, all voyages linked to a vessel in the selected time range are segmented into one hour blocks, and the proportion of each hour block a vessel in a voyage has at least one AIS transmission. An ‘N/A’ value could be due to no reported activity for the vessel in the selected time range. This could be of poor coverage, but may also be the result of inactivity e.g. the vessel undergoing maintenance. In these cases, we recommend you check additional information sources and request supporting records from the vessel.
Caveats
- As the AIS coverage metric is calculated based on voyages, eg. the vessel’s activity between port visits, coverage is reflective of the time and AIS reception quality while a vessel is active at sea rather than at port.
- Voyage is defined based on port visits (exit and entry). Any issue detecting port visits for a vessel may result in lower accuracy of the AIS coverage calculation.
- The coverage metric does not distinguish between a lack of activity (non-event) and poor transmission resulting in disability to detect a true event.
Learn more
Learn more about our work on transmission gaps
",
+ "insightsFishing": "Overview
Global Fishing Watch (GFW) analyzes and applies a fishing detection algorithm based on AIS data collected from vessels. Each AIS broadcast data point is classified as either “apparently fishing” or not fishing, and further reviewed to determine individual “fishing events”.
Based on the time range of interest, the following two insights are reviewed:
- Any apparent fishing events detected in areas with no known RFMO authorization
- Any apparent fishing events detected in no-take MPAs
Fishing in areas with no known RFMO authorization
GFW indicates any apparent fishing events in areas with no known RFMO authorization compiled from 7 Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (RFMO) lists*.
Caveats
- The insight covers the listed RFMO areas only*.
- The insight does not include national registration or licensing lists.
Fishing in no-take Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)
This insight is presented by cross-referencing any apparent fishing events in the boundaries of no-take MPAs (Source: World Database on Protected Areas ).
Caveats
- Events close to boundary lines may be reported as being inside an MPA boundary. We recommend that you check the vessel track positions on the map alongside adding the MPA layer to confirm exact operation.
- There may be variability in no-take MPA permissions and restrictions based on seasonal closures and gear restrictions.
General caveats
- Due to limited access to national databases, the insights do not consider other unknown authorizations e.g. seasonal closures, fishing authorisation within EEZs.
- All references to activity events (e.g. fishing), should be understood in the context of GFW's algorithms, which are best efforts to determine apparent fishing activity events based on AIS data collected.
- While the insights provide potential events, GFW recommends to visually inspect vessel tracks, always refer to additional information sources, and request records from a vessel to confirm any findings.
* The 7 RFMO lists considered for the authorization insight include:
- Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
- International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
- Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
- North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
- South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
- Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
Learn more
Learn more about how apparent fishing is estimated through Global Fishing Watch’s technology , and the difference between apparent fishing effort and fishing events. ",
+ "insightsFlagsChanges": "Overview
This insight tracks and details when the registry information available on a vessel indicates the vessel has been flagged to more than one unique flag state during the time range of interest, indicating a potential flag change. Adjust the end date of the time bar to present date to show the current vessel flag; Extend time range to track historical changes.
Caveats
- Global Fishing Watch matches vessel identity data with over 40 public registries to validate an individual vessel and enable tracking of identity and activity changes throughout the vessel’s lifetime from construction to scrapping.
- The vessel identity insights rely solely on registry data. The insights do not consider AIS based vessel flag identity.
- The quantity and quality of available registry data vary by flag state, thereby introducing uneven degrees of vessel identity information.
- Conflicts between information sources can occur leading to incorrect identification of vessel flags. This is more common for vessels not listed on public registries and vessels operating under multiple flags within a short time range.
- While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed, particularly on any changes outside of the monthly data update cycle.
Learn more
Global Fishing Watch works to offset the lack of public registry data by complementing with other data sources and advocating for transparency in regional and national fora. Learn more about:
Vessel identity and characterization ",
+ "insightsGaps": "Overview
AIS devices are designed to continually broadcast a vessel’s position to avoid collisions. Thus, when a vessel has an extended gap in AIS transmissions or positions, it can potentially indicate intentional AIS disabling or suspicious behavior.
The AIS off events insight is based on the time range of interest.
Global Fishing Watch records all AIS gap events over six hours, and then applies a set of filters below to identify those gaps we believe to be intentional AIS disabling rather than technical failures. The filter criteria for ‘likely disabling’ are:
- The gap event must be at least 12 hours;
- The gap must start at least 50 nautical miles (nm) from shore;
- The gap must start in an area with a satellite reception quality greater than 10 positions per day;
- The vessel must have at least 14 satellite positions in the 12 hours prior to the gap.
Caveats
- The dataset used to formulate this insight remains in prototype stage, which means it is still under quality assurance processes with possibility of data issues and may not include the most up-to-date data points or changes.
- Gaps outside of the above filter criteria (e.g. activity within 50 nm) are not recognised. Using this AIS off events insight to evaluate activity within 50 nm from shore for example would be uninformative and potentially misleading.
- Gaps shorter than 12 hours are not considered for this insight due to variability of satellite orbit timings.
- Gap events less than 50 nm from shore (inshore) are also not considered, due to differences in satellite and terrestrial AIS with satellite AIS reception generally decreases closer to shore coupled by higher vessel density resulting in signal interference.
- The AIS reception quality estimates used to identify the insights are based on data for 2017- 2019 from Welch et al. (2022) while we work to automate monthly estimates from 2019 until present day.
- While the insight aims to provide ‘likely AIS disabling’ events, the insight is unable to confirm whether the gap events are intentional.
- We recommend referencing additional information sources and request supporting records from the vessel for comprehensive AIS gap events review.
",
+ "insightsMOUList": "Overview
This insight tracks and details when the registry information on a vessel's identity indicates a flag record matching a flag on the Tokyo and/or Paris MOU Black or Grey lists based on your time range of interest. Adjust the end date of the time bar to present date to show the current vessel flag status; Extend time range to track historical changes.
Caveats
- Global Fishing Watch matches vessel identity data with over 40 public registries to validate an individual vessel and enable tracking of identity and activity changes throughout the vessel’s lifetime from construction to scrapping.
- The vessel identity insights rely solely on registry data. The insights do not consider AIS based vessel flag identity.
- The Tokyo and Paris MOU lists have been obtained consistently by GFW since mid-2021, and the insight is based on flag identity on and after 2021, not before.
- The data is maintained on an annual basis.
- While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed, particularly on any changes outside of the annual data update cycle.
",
+ "insightsIUU": "Overview
This insight presents illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) listing status according to the official Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO) IUU vessel lists. A vessel is defined as ‘currently listed’ if they were present on an RFMO IUU vessel list during your time range of interest. To view the vessel’s latest status, please adjust the end date of the timebar to the present date. Vessels that were on the RFMO IUU list in the past and have since been delisted (for example because of a change in ownership, or because the vessel is no longer in service), or have never been listed are indicated as ‘not listed’.
Caveats
- This insight is kept up-to-date periodically since 2017.
- The insight includes data from 13 official RFMO IUU vessel lists* only. Vessels that have a history of suspected or proven IUU or other non-compliance, but have never been listed by the relevant RFMOs will not be flagged here.
- IUU-listed and IUU-engaged vessels tend to change identities, locations, and operations frequently to evade detection. While every attempt is made to ensure the insight provided is accurate and up-to-date, this cannot be guaranteed due to delays, reporting or administrative errors resulting in incorrect display of information at the RFMO and/or in this Global Fishing Watch insight.
- Global Fishing Watch recommends to always refer to additional data sources, including verification of the original data source*, and/or request additional records from a vessel to confirm any findings.
* The 13 RFMO IUU vessel lists considered for this insight include: (Date source: TMT Combined IUU Vessel List )
- Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
- Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT)
- General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC)
- International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
- Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC)
- Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO)
- North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)
- North Pacific Fisheries Commission (NPFC)
- South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
- South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
- Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement (SIOFA)
- Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)
"
}