You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Time: Bi-weekly @ 1700 (BST) - See the time in your timezone
Co-Chair - Chris Xie- (Futurewei)
Co-Chair - Vacant
Convener – Sean Mcilroy (Linux Foundation)
Antitrust Policy
Joint Development Foundation meetings may involve participation by industry competitors, and the Joint Development Foundation intends to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is, therefore, extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas and be aware of and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel or counsel to the Joint Development Foundation, DLA Piper.
Recordings
WG agreed to record all Meetings. This meeting recording will be available until the next scheduled meeting. Meeting recording link
Roll Call
Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:
Full Name, Affiliation, (optional) GitHub username
Agenda
Approve agenda
Approve previous Meeting Minutes
Introductions - Chris
Any new members?
Previous meeting Summary notes
The group discussed developing and implementing a new software labelling system. Chris emphasized the need for easy adoption and business value, stressing the importance of making the label accessible and verifiable. Asim provided detailed specifications for the label, which included using a QR code linking to a manifest file for verification. They also discussed potential policy benefits, such as compliance with EU policies like the CSRD. The conversation ended with the decision to create a comprehensive white paper outlining the new labelling system's business value, policy implications, and the importance of providing tools for easy adoption.
Previous meeting Summary Notes & AI's
Summary Notes
The team proposed adding label components, including a timestamp, standard number, and the name of the issuing authority. They also discussed the impact framework for calculating software carbon emissions (SCI) scores and emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of existing references. The following steps involve updating the proposed development branch, creating a new feature branch, and finalizing the label design.
Update the proposed SCI label design to include the label name and issuing authority name.
Create a mockup of the updated SCI label design.
Push the updated SCI label specification into the new dev branch and create a pull request.
2024.12.11 Agenda/Minutes
Time: Bi-weekly @ 1700 (BST) - See the time in your timezone
Antitrust Policy
Joint Development Foundation meetings may involve participation by industry competitors, and the Joint Development Foundation intends to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is, therefore, extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas and be aware of and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel or counsel to the Joint Development Foundation, DLA Piper.
Recordings
WG agreed to record all Meetings. This meeting recording will be available until the next scheduled meeting.
Meeting recording link
Roll Call
Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.
Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:
Agenda
Introductions - Chris
Previous meeting Summary notes
The group discussed developing and implementing a new software labelling system. Chris emphasized the need for easy adoption and business value, stressing the importance of making the label accessible and verifiable. Asim provided detailed specifications for the label, which included using a QR code linking to a manifest file for verification. They also discussed potential policy benefits, such as compliance with EU policies like the CSRD. The conversation ended with the decision to create a comprehensive white paper outlining the new labelling system's business value, policy implications, and the importance of providing tools for easy adoption.
Previous meeting Summary Notes & AI's
The team proposed adding label components, including a timestamp, standard number, and the name of the issuing authority. They also discussed the impact framework for calculating software carbon emissions (SCI) scores and emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of existing references. The following steps involve updating the proposed development branch, creating a new feature branch, and finalizing the label design.
Discussions
Future meeting Agenda submissions
Next Meeting
Adjourn
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: