-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
associations.batch_api.read does not support pagination? #187
Comments
Just saw that there is another issue open about this, sorry! #135 |
Hi @fromfarland. |
@alzheltkovskiy-hubspot Good to know, thank you! |
Hi, is there an update or an ETA here already? :) (The restriction to 100 association results is really hindering how we use the API and theferore renders our implementation somewhat pointless currently.) |
Hi everyone could you check the latest version? |
Hi @alzheltkovskiy-hubspot, thanks for the update! I checked out the latest version, the response now contains the missing However, I did not figure out how use this as a parameter / paginate through results using |
Hi @alzheltkovskiy-hubspot, it seems to me like this still is not really usable because there is no way to include the Can you help out here? Thanks! |
Hi! My first issue here - after being able to figure a lot of things by myself, I finally ran into something that I can't seem to get my head around.
Is there a way to get more than 100 results from
associations.batch_api.read
? After checking the repo, it seems to me that the function does not support pagination; or rather, the API response does not include apaging
key like others do.Code snippet explanation: I wrote a function
get_batch_associations
that takes a list of IDs for a certain object type and gets all the associations to another object type. (This calls another functionchunk_list
that takes a list of IDs, then splits them into chunks of 100.)All ideas are much appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: