We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For example there is a boundBy predicate as in promoter boundBy tf, and there is also a bindsTo predicate as in tf bindsTo promoter.
boundBy
promoter boundBy tf
bindsTo
tf bindsTo promoter
My concerns about this:
consumedBy
consumes
Can we simplify by settling on one of the two predicates in these cases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Granted that inverse predicates are a thing in RDF land. I guess I might have spent too much time working on SBOL. ;-)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
For example there is a
boundBy
predicate as inpromoter boundBy tf
, and there is also abindsTo
predicate as intf bindsTo promoter
.My concerns about this:
consumedBy
but not aconsumes
.Can we simplify by settling on one of the two predicates in these cases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: