Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

painting motivations in search examples are unclear #2298

Open
azaroth42 opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

painting motivations in search examples are unclear #2298

azaroth42 opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

https://iiif.io/api/search/2.0/#responses should use supplementing rather than painting to prevent confusion.

They're not technically wrong -- you can paint text just like you can paint images or anything else -- but normally this would be for transcriptions (and similar) which are supplementing in 3.0 rather than the undifferentiated painting in 2.x

Propose to update to supplementing in 2.1 / 3.0

From Emily Lynema in Slack on #search.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants