Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

processing steps to be on the lookout for in a CRAM? #30

Open
brettva opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

processing steps to be on the lookout for in a CRAM? #30

brettva opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@brettva
Copy link

brettva commented Oct 12, 2022

Thank you for developing this tool. I have a collaborator that has some CRAMS that I might use as input for this caller. I see in the documentation that processing steps like bwa-postalt should be avoided. I am wondering are there any other obvious processing steps that I should be on the lookout for when evaluating whether these CRAMS are suitable as input for Cyrius?

Thank you

@xiao-chen-xc
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @brettva I think it should be find as long as the post-processing steps do not change the MAPQ. I would recommend that you run a small set of samples first and check the call rate, i.e. samples that have a call instead of "None". If you see many samples have a "None" call, feel free to reach out to me and we can troubleshoot together.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants