You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing this tool. I have a collaborator that has some CRAMS that I might use as input for this caller. I see in the documentation that processing steps like bwa-postalt should be avoided. I am wondering are there any other obvious processing steps that I should be on the lookout for when evaluating whether these CRAMS are suitable as input for Cyrius?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @brettva I think it should be find as long as the post-processing steps do not change the MAPQ. I would recommend that you run a small set of samples first and check the call rate, i.e. samples that have a call instead of "None". If you see many samples have a "None" call, feel free to reach out to me and we can troubleshoot together.
Thank you for developing this tool. I have a collaborator that has some CRAMS that I might use as input for this caller. I see in the documentation that processing steps like bwa-postalt should be avoided. I am wondering are there any other obvious processing steps that I should be on the lookout for when evaluating whether these CRAMS are suitable as input for Cyrius?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: