You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Danack
changed the title
Explicitly don't support alpine.
Explicitly don't support alpine? To be clear it works, but I don't want to spend time on it.
Feb 21, 2022
Alpine has it's uses. Having a container be 10MB instead of 200MB is a great advantage.
But the difference in size between Debian slim with Imagick installed and alpine with Imagick installed is a much smaller size difference.
It's also a good idea to have 1 Imagick container running on 1 'physical'* CPU core
It's currently annoyingly hard to open bugs against imagick in alpine which means that those people end up opening bugs here instead.
If something gives not much benefit to users, and has a cost for me, why don't I just say "alpine is unsupported, use debian slim instead"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: