Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Mamba instead of Conda? #15

Open
AdrianDAlessandro opened this issue Apr 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Use Mamba instead of Conda? #15

AdrianDAlessandro opened this issue Apr 28, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@AdrianDAlessandro
Copy link
Contributor

There is a micromamba docker image that might be worth checking out for efficiency improvements.

@dandavies99
Copy link
Contributor

Nice find and this cuts down the build time and final image size both by somewhere between 2x and 3x. It also means we are installing into the base environment, so don't need to mess around to use specific conda environment within Docker. See #16.

However, for reasons discussed in person, it might be best to stick with miniconda for this example to keep things consistent. I'll close that PR but leave this issue open to remind me to:

  • Add a note to the docs that micromamba is an option, with links to the micromamba docker image.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants