You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently in the variable density versions of the code the following happens in terms of factors of rho
The old ( "t=n" ) density is used in
step 2: this is uncontroversial
step 3: There is a question over whether advect_dens should occur before this (immediately after step_2) and then a half time density can be computed for use in this step (you would also need to flesh out the code for step 3 which assumes a lot of things don't change but now do with the different factor of rho). This is what seems to happen in lm_atm in pyro2.
The half time (t=n+1/2) density is used in:
step 4: gravitational source /forcing for the beta/rho or 1/rho coefficient (seems appropriate). (NB only in the atmospheric code, the other versions have not been updated yet and use the n+1 value for rho).
The new (t=n+1) density is used in:
step 4: for the 1/rho coefficient in front of the lagged pressure (this seems inappropriate)
all of step 5: seems appropriate.
In other words:
Should advect_dens be called before step_3, and used in the updated interface states ? (as it is in pyro2 lm_atm? Remember, step_3 would have to be fleshed out in this case - it basically assumes nothing changes except for a new up-winding.
Should you use a half time rho for all coefficients in step_4? (i.e. not just for gravity in the case of the atmospheric version, and if so update other versions consistently.)
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: