You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Previously there was an issue with inserting commit message guidance into the contributor's guide. This inspires me, as there is a possible improvement in the contributor's guide:
In the first situation, the definition has left different amounts' spacings in order to bring the same indentation level to the operator =, while the second situation only allows one space between different things. These are two different indentations.
In the previous issues, I did not know which case we should use the first situation, and which case we should use the second situation. I did not find useful information in the contributor's guide.
@JacquesCarette, I feel some requirements become invisible or ambiguous. Sometimes I do not know some requirements, and sometimes there are collisions between different requirements. (Similar as conflicts)
There is something I want to improve:
Insert an information field inside "Coding Style", to include information about definition spacing. (There are many different cases for spacing, each case should be summarized into requirements, and should include a good example inside for each case)
MORE Points are coming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
daijingz
changed the title
Contributor's Guide Further Update:
Contributor's Guide Further Update
Jun 16, 2024
Previously there was an issue with inserting commit message guidance into the contributor's guide. This inspires me, as there is a possible improvement in the contributor's guide:
In the first situation, the definition has left different amounts' spacings in order to bring the same indentation level to the operator
=
, while the second situation only allows one space between different things. These are two different indentations.In the previous issues, I did not know which case we should use the first situation, and which case we should use the second situation. I did not find useful information in the contributor's guide.
@JacquesCarette, I feel some requirements become invisible or ambiguous. Sometimes I do not know some requirements, and sometimes there are collisions between different requirements. (Similar as conflicts)
There is something I want to improve:
MORE Points are coming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: