You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the meshlets are created greedily, by expanding the generated meshlet by adding the next "best triangle" adjacent to the generated meshlet. "The best triangle" is currently defined based on the triangle distance from the generated meshlet center, which results in "scale look" and optimizes the bounding sphere of the meshlet. However, it could be useful to have other heuristics to define the "best triangle", e.g. using the similarity of the triangle normals instead to favor meshlet "flatness".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the meshlets are created greedily, by expanding the generated meshlet by adding the next "best triangle" adjacent to the generated meshlet. "The best triangle" is currently defined based on the triangle distance from the generated meshlet center, which results in "scale look" and optimizes the bounding sphere of the meshlet. However, it could be useful to have other heuristics to define the "best triangle", e.g. using the similarity of the triangle normals instead to favor meshlet "flatness".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: